Thermodynamic Limits of Proof
Tristan Simas
cs.CC
Jan 22, 2026 · v5
cs.LO math-ph math.CT
TL;DR
Budget arithmetic, threshold lemmas, query-to-record bridges and proof-act bookkeeping are mechanized in Lean 4 with Mathlib, with a handle ledger and axiom scan.
Abstract
Every irreversible recorded distinction has a positive thermodynamic work floor. Landauer's principle supplies the ideal bound $\varepsilon\ge k_B T\ln 2$ per irreversible bit, experimentally verified to $\pm 10\%$. Proof available to an agent is checkable information for that agent: some substrate must produce, retain, and expose evidence that excludes answer-changing alternatives. A finite detector array operating at temperature $T$ for finite time has finite signal-acquisition capacity. Combining finite causal access, positive retained-record cost, and exact lower bounds on required records gives the Physical Counting Impossibility Theorem: no fixed-budget substrate can provide universal exact proof once the retained-record lower bound exceeds the declared budget. The theorem requires exactly $B<\infty$ and $\varepsilon>0$. An answer reports a value; proof supplies checkable grounds for accepting it. A reversible device may compute an answer and erase its scratch history, but proof requires retained, inspectable records. A global answer register, oracle response, entanglement witness, finite survey catalog, or trusted device output supplies proof only through an interface that exposes the relevant grounds to the verifier. A proposed interface must identify the retained-record lower-bound family $R(n)$ it induces. Sound operational claims about efficient solvability inherit the same finite-budget obstruction when their acceptance would license universal exact proof. Substrate-free derivability has proof status only when a physical verification event makes it available to an agent.
Problem
The paper asks whether a finite physical substrate can provide universal exact proof, given that every retained irreversible record has a positive thermodynamic work cost (Landauer's bound) and that signal acquisition is limited by relativity.
Approach
Proof is modeled as retained, inspectable evidence over a declared finite-resolution query interface with a finite budget B, a per-record cost floor ε>0, and a lower-bound family R(n) of required records drawn from query complexity (for example parity, sign queries and hidden truth tables). A Physical Counting Impossibility Theorem is derived from these premises. The arithmetic and interface bookkeeping are mechanized in Lean 4 with Mathlib, and a ledger maps each claim to a Lean declaration.
Results
No fixed-budget, positive-cost substrate can give universal exact proof once εR(n) exceeds B; parity alone already forces R(n)=n. An axiom scan of 121 Lean declarations found 3 that use no kernel axioms; most of the rest rely on the standard classical axioms.
| Category | Count |
|---|
| Discovered theorem/lemma declarations | 121 |
| Successfully checked by Lean | 121 |
| No Lean kernel axioms reported | 3 |
| Depends on Classical.choice | 114 |
| Depends on propext | 118 |
Lean axiom scan (selected rows)