← All papers
First page of An intrinsically subcritical four-point counterexample

An intrinsically subcritical four-point counterexample

Vignon Oussa

math.CA Aug 6, 2026 · v1 math.DS
Provides a Lean 4/Mathlib companion file that machine-checks algebraic parts of the counterexample certificate; it is not an end-to-end formalization.
Building on the vector-Zak and cohomological framework developed by Faulhuber, Petersen, van Velthoven, and Voigtlaender in their twelve-point counterexample, we give a computer-assisted four-point counterexample with a nonzero complex-valued Schwartz window. Every symplectic triangle determinant of the explicit configuration has absolute value below one, placing it in the intrinsically subcritical regime.

The Heil–Ramanathan–Topiwala conjecture asserts that finitely many distinct time–frequency shifts of a nonzero L^2 function are linearly independent. It was disproved with a twelve-point counterexample. The open question is whether a smaller, intrinsically subcritical counterexample exists.

The construction uses the vector-Zak and cohomological framework of Faulhuber et al., replacing their eleven-term Weyl polynomial with a three-term half-lattice polynomial composed with an irrational shift built from the cube root of 2. A dominated invariant line comes from a validated sixteen-step domination certificate computed with Arb. Multiplier winding is controlled by a two-gauge half-plane argument. An explicit Diophantine bound then yields smooth cohomological reconstruction. A Lean 4/Mathlib file corroborates the algebraic parts of the argument.

The paper exhibits four dependent time–frequency shifts of a nonzero complex-valued Schwartz function, which is minimal cardinality. Every symplectic triangle determinant of the configuration lies strictly between 0 and 1. The Lean companion compiles with Lean 4.28.0 and Mathlib with no sorry or extra axioms.