← All papers
First page of Are trees really just butterflies in disguise?

Are trees really just butterflies in disguise?

Giovanne Santos, Maya Stein, Ella Williams

math.CO Sep 8, 2026 · v2
Section 6's proof of the antidirected-tree Erdős–Sós-type conjecture, extending an AI proof, has a Lean 4 formalisation credited to DeBiasio.
As a generalisation of the Erdős-Sós conjecture about graphs, Addario-Berry, Havet, Linhares Sales, Reed and Thomassé conjectured that every digraph on $n$ vertices with more than $(k-1)n$ arcs contains every antidirected tree with $k$ arcs. We prove a dense, approximate version of this for trees with bounded maximum degree, as well as for trees whose layers are evenly distributed. We use a regularity based approach, centred around finding a copy of a given tree in the blow up of a caterpillar.

Addario-Berry et al. conjectured that every digraph on n vertices with more than (k-1)n arcs contains every antidirected tree with k arcs. This generalises the Erdős–Sós conjecture.

A diregularity-lemma approach reduces the problem to embedding the tree into the blow-up of an antidirected caterpillar inside the reduced digraph. The tree is decomposed into seeds and small pieces and assigned via homomorphisms to a caterpillar. Separately, an AI-generated proof of the Erdős–Sós conjecture is adapted to the antidirected setting using a permutation-marking counting argument. That adaptation has a Lean 4 formalisation by DeBiasio.

The paper proves dense approximate versions of the conjecture for bounded-degree antidirected trees and for trees with evenly distributed layers. It derives an asymptotic Burr's conjecture for bounded-degree antidirected trees and linear Ramsey bounds. It also gives a full proof of the conjecture by extending the AI proof, with a Lean 4 formalisation available.