Let $G$ be a finite bipartite graph and let $\widetilde G$ be an $M$-fold cover. We compare independent sets of $\widetilde G$ with those of the trivial cover, consisting of $M$ disjoint copies of $G$, after prescribing how many vertices are selected above each vertex of $G$. A conjecture from 2011, motivated by the Bethe approximation, asserts that the trivial cover maximizes every such count. We prove this for every feasible occupation profile whose active graph has treewidth at most two or is chordal bipartite. Equality holds exactly when the restricted cover is flat, meaning that fibre relabelings make it trivial. For $M\ge2$ and positive feasible occupations, a nonflat cover of a connected bipartite graph of treewidth at most two has a deficit of at least twice the coefficient of $p_G^{M-2}$ with every occupation reduced by one. A holonomy-dependent bound improves the factor to three for odd-order holonomy; both uniform constants are sharp. Comparison and rigidity survive finite compositions along an edge or a vertex, and quantitative bounds from one piece propagate to the whole graph, giving results beyond the two original classes. On any bipartite base, the first nonzero homogeneous defect is determined by the shortest cycles with nontrivial holonomy. At singleton occupations, our counts are numbers of DP-colorings of full covers. The dual DP color function on these classes and their finite seam compositions equals the chromatic polynomial, with equality attained precisely by canonical labelings. Dong's chromatic-polynomial inequality then yields the Dual-DP Shameful inequality on the same graph class. The main theorems have been formalized in Lean 4.